Half-orcs raised among orcs and willing to live out their lives among them are usually evil.”

Half Orcs are as inheriting “a tendency toward chaos from their orc parents and are not strongly inclined toward good. They tend toward good as well, with a strong sense of fair play and a belief that everyone deserves to share in the benefits of a just order.” PC alignment The Player’s Handbook actually includes alignments for races, with descriptions like “most dwarves are lawful, believing firmly in the benefits of a well-ordered society. Instead, I urge DMs to view a monster’s alignment the same as they would a PC’s. It might be useful for DMs to know which type of dragon would be most likely to help (or hinder) the Lawful Good party’s pursuits, but I think DMs should consider the posted alignment as merely a generalization of the monster type, rather than a certainty that all creatures of that type fall under that alignment. Sure, every monsters stat block has some combo of lawful-neutral-chaotic and good-neutral-evil, but I honestly don’t think that DMs or players should feel the need to stick hard and fast with those descriptions. 5 strange magic items that will be sure to get a laugh in your D&D game.Here’s how to play Dungeons and Dragons 5e on Very Hard mode.

7 best feats for any class in Dungeons and Dragons 5e.

So why are we being so strict when it comes to the alignment of D&D monsters? The ability for DMs and players to mold the TTRPG’s mechanics around what is most fitting for their own table is what makes D&D (and other tabletop roleplaying games) feel that much more personal than, say, a video game with set rules.

The best thing about D&D is how flexible the game can be.

D&d monster races